Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Lawrence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:52, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Joel Lawrence[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Significant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:22, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:09, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:10, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets of WP:PORNBIO. Subtropical-man (talk / en-2) 10:12, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Yet another won-an-award-but-the-sources-are-crap porn bio. This may pass the most liberal reading of PORNBIO, but I don't see such a low bar as a predictor of notability. • Gene93k (talk) 10:22, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia needs to be built on reliable sources. This article totally lacks them. The possible passing of PORNbio here indicates that that inclusion standard is way too broad.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:51, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The paucity of biographical information indicates that the claimed award was not significant enough to generate RS coverage. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 19:08, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per PORNBIO & GNG & all that shizz. –Davey2010^Talk 21:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.