Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Rajan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). Of note is that two of the sources posted by User:Skr15081997 are independent reliable sources, specifically The Times of India and Indian Express sources. This is contrary to the notion that none of the sources posted by User:Skr15081997 are reliable (in the comment below the !vote). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:33, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Rajan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biogrpahical and seems balant marketing Shrikanthv (talk) 07:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 00:40, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Joe Rajan seems to be notable.See here 1 2 3 4 5 6 7,Instead of being deleted the article needs to be cleaned up of unnecessary content.--Skr15081997 (talk) 16:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

None of those sources are reliable secondary sources. Please read WP:GNG. Most of your links are websites. Nothing there constitutes "significan coverage." Fowler&fowler «Talk» 14:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 17:17, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.