Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Luginbill (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination, particularly if not cleaned up to help editors assess notability. J04n(talk page) 22:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Luginbill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references given (one of which is repeated under three different URLs) don't appear to me to establish notability, and the article doesn't really explain why he should have an article. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:08, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Without having to dig, one can easily find sources of Luginbill. If the URLs are an issue, you can certainly ask some of us who are based in Western Wisconsin near him. He hosts a talk radio show with relatively high ratings on the east coast as well. Definitely passes for notability. -User:DevelopementEditor (talk) 10:27, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 17:08, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lack of significant coverage. And DevelopmentEditor may be more interested in promoting his "hometown".[1]. Levdr1lostpassword / talk 05:49, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I was one of the first people to work on this page - I primarily work on YouTube personality pages. He was added to Wikipedia when his YouTube videos started receiving millions of views and his channel was featured on the front page of YouTube. During that time period, his content was shared on many media outlets. In my opinion he meets the criteria for a notable public figure. -User:DrewJ1980 (talk) 10:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 21:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral (for now) - I'm more than happy to consider the case put forward by the keep crowd but I must say, it's very difficult to do with the sources the way they are. It's not clear which sources are supposed to verify which claims and some are just obviously unreliable. Do any of the "keepers" want to have a crack at cleaning it up so we can get a better appreciation for those sources that might confer notability? Stalwart111 01:01, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.