Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Gurney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Gurney

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG with only WP:ROUTINE sourcing. Fails WP:NHOCKEY with no notable individual achievements in the lower minor leagues and only played in NCAA Div. III, not Div I. Yosemiter (talk) 20:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. One of many NN hockey articles created by User talk:Jasonstru, this is especially giggleworthy given that the article's based around a consecutive goal scoring record made in the subject's single professional season in the mid-minors, which even were such marks notable (they wouldn't be at any level), was made in the league's second month of play. Ravenswing 01:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, nothing in his bio suggests a reason for an article.18abruce (talk) 23:07, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.