Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Daniels (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:51, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Daniels (actor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about a film actor was started in 2007, but in 2009 was vandalised by two IPs who introduced a lot of silly nonsense. No-one noticed (except that later that year IPs tried to blank it, but were reverted) until recently it was tagged for deletion as a hoax. Having restored the last good version, I checked to see whether the subject's career had progressed since then, but it seems not, see IMDb. I can't find any trace of "The Bond 2", Cheers Butt Productions doesn't seem to have done anything since 2006 and their website says "The company at this present time is not creating any films". The top four entries here are about him, but the first one is a deadlink and the others don't show any significant or recent activity. This does not meet the notability standard of WP:NACTOR. JohnCD (talk) 22:37, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. JohnCD (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While it being vandalized does not make the original version a hoax that would qualify for a speedy (only an article that needed returning to a non-vandalized version), the fellow's minimal and unglamorous career fails WP:ENT [1] and a lack of any sort of actual coverage fails WP:GNG. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails the notability guidelines for this type of subject. WaggersTALK 10:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.