Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Chappell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Joe Chappell[edit]
This was disputed as a speedy delete, but there is really nothing in this article that asserts any importance or significance. Google gets 128 hits, few of which are relevant to this Joe Chappell, and none of which could be considered significant media citations. Which makes sense because he's barely out of college. Let's wait until he becomes notable in his own right, and then write an article about him. Delete. GeorgeStepanek\talk 04:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. —C.Fred (talk) 05:58, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- DElete as a bio of a non-notable person. Not sure how Academic Challenger came to the conclusion that this is not a {{db-bio}} candidate but certainly the article does not assert that this meets WP:BIO. - Peripitus (Talk) 06:48, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article fails to assert notability of subject Ydam 12:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete most likely vanity, but ceraintly fails to assert notability. Adambiswanger1 14:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Definitely not notable, likely vanity. Vartan84 16:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Please delete as I now see why this does not fit WP:BIO requirements. Romanpoems 16:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 01:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.