Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Blade (series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Blade (series)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary "... (series)" article: there is Joe Blade and Joe Blade 2, Joe Blade 3 is a redirect. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:44, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find a formal policy for series by notability, but I would assume that if sources aren't there to provide coverage on the background, development or assessment of the series as a whole, there is no notability for an article that purports to cover the series as a whole, even if its individual games are notable. Happy to strike this if someone does a WP:BEFORE and finds otherwise. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 05:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.