Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Antouri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 11:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Antouri

This is likely a result of paid editing (see my COIN posting)

The subject himself doesn't meet WP:N or WP:BIO as he's not discussed in any detail in reliable, third-party sources. Of the references in this article, the first is irrelevant and leads to a spammy promotion, and the second appears to be minor coverage of a product he's affiliated with. A Google search fails to turn up anything that evidences notability per our guidelines. And a google news search leads to only one article from over 20 years ago, and the coverage is sensational, not encyclopedic, so it is against WP:NOT#NEWS. Them From Space 20:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete per nom - perhaps this nomination should also include Private Trainers Association, which doesn't seem to have much of an existence seperate from Mr Antouri? Note that the only external reference (which I doubt passes WP:RS in any case) is an advert for Mr Antouri's chewing gum, rather than his organization... Tevildo (talk) 21:13, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I also nominated the affiliated article, Private Trainers Association, for deletion. Them From Space 21:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Spam, COI, NN (V:FAIL). --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 22:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.