Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jodie Hudson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:56, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jodie Hudson[edit]

A disputed speedy where notability was asserted. To me, this seems to be a classic example of WP:BIO1E; even if this event is notable, and I don't for a moment suggest that it is, I can't accept that the young person involved is even remotely notable. However, the article's creator makes enough of a case that I have brought it to the community for a decision. Accounting4Taste:talk 14:18, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- If every person became notable for having a party, then every person would have an article. Tarret ^talk 14:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If there was a speedy applicable I'd argue that as well. I note that one of the better precedents mentioned in the article, Corey Delaney, had his article deleted (again) via afd in the last week and this article should be deleted as well for the same reasons. Debate (talk) 15:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't think this is sufficient for a Wikipedia article. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 21:32, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At the most it's news. ~ Antiselfpromotion (talk) 08:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.