Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanne Arena

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, with no prejudice towards a redirect to Harvey Glatman, or a mention in that article. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:56, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joanne Arena[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENT. No assertion of notability as a model; only as an almost-victim of a serial killer, making it very WP:BLP1E-ish. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 16:56, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The very definition of WP:BLP1E.Chromancer (talk) 17:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with Chromancer.scope_creep (talk) 18:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Harvey Glatman. A few passing mentions in GBooks. Not enough for a stand-alone article but redirects are cheap. Location (talk) 19:47, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect as article fails notability criteria for models. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 00:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Harvey Glatman: Arena's importance is noteworthy for being a primary reason for Glatman's capture, As much detail as possible should be included when merged because Arena adds more substance and information to any biography of Glatman.Robert (talk) 20:16, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per the article, all Arena did was decline to come with Glatman. His capture was entirely to the credit of Lorraine Vigil. I don't disagree with Arena being mentioned, but emphasizing her bio over the victims' or Vigil's in Glatman's article doesn't mesh with WP:UNDUE. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 14:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as she fails WP:VICTIM, WP:ONEVENT, WP:ENTERTAINER etc. A two sentence mention on Glatman's article would be fine, but I agree with Mbinebri that a full merge would be undue. Claritas § 10:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.