Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanna Evans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Neighbours characters#E. Merging material (there seems to be some in the history) would be acceptable per the consensus here, and in the future editors should feel free to do so. However right now the target list article is not set up to give any information beyond character and actor name and dates said character was on the show, so a merge is simply not possible at the moment. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 06:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joanna Evans[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short lived soap character with no significance outside the show. The article remained a single line stub for 4 years which is a strong evidence that there are no reliable sources to cover the subject independently of the show, or even within the show. Magioladitis (talk) 13:24, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - Totally agree with nom, but think that the page should be a re-direct to List of Neighbours characters#E and remove the wiki-link. Codf1977 (talk) 11:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect - Agree with nom, no reliable refs available. As one of the Neighbours editors, even I feel that there is no need to create articles for characters who only are recurring for a short time. Hopefully I have now found a way that will stop unreferenced stubs from being created in future. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 16:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Neighbours characters as suggested. No indication that this particular character has any special notability. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
merge The present list is not sufficient coverage -- there needs to be enough information to give some idea of the role. a sentence or two would be sufficient. I heartily agree with merging articles like this, but to leave it as a bare statement of the name and the actor is not sufficient information. I think that every character in that list should have such expansion, whether or not it justifies a separate article. DGG ( talk ) 03:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or merge. Clearly not notable for an article in its own right but there may be some content to warrant inclusion in a merge. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.