Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joana de Verona

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The delete !voter Trilifendi does not even have the reason why deleting the article, and apart from that the consensus is clear that Joana meets WP:NACTOR and even WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Joana de Verona[edit]

Joana de Verona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 23:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 23:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 23:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep More example of coverage: [3], [4], [5], [6], which pushes her of the notability edge in my opinion. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 17:09, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:37, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No reason? Is there any analysis that lead to this conclusion? Oakshade (talk) 20:26, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Appears sufficiently notable from the coverage she has received. --Michig (talk) 06:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:21, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.