Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan E. Goody
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 02:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Joan E. Goody (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Subject is not-notable, article seems vanity or spam for her firm. Does not conform to any of the criteria proposed for notability as creative professional or academic Gorgonzola (talk) 19:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —Gorgonzola (talk) 19:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, quite a bit about her in Google Books and Google News Archive including a listing in the Encyclopedia of 20th Century Architecture. Seems to have a national reputation in the field of urban (particularly residential) architecture. --Dhartung | Talk 22:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Chetblong (talk) 02:06, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect into Goody, Clancy & Associates, Inc. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:23, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The listing in the Encyclopedia of 20th C Arch. is just the kind of reliable source that indicates this article is worth keeping. Mostlyharmless (talk) 02:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Well known, important, American architect. Blah blah blah. Obviously no research into the subject was done about this nomination. Amusing nomination, I expected to see a crappy article all about her firm. It just mentions it, and there's no vanity anywhere near the level this architect deserves and gets. --Blechnic (talk) 08:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per above. 199 hits from various media sources shows her notablility. Artene50 (talk) 09:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.