Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiuxian railway station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:52, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jiuxian railway station[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reference or links, not sure what the Chinese name is or where exactly in Guizhou it's located. Timmyshin (talk) 20:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:36, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:36, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete I can find no evidence of it and the location is very dubious – in Guizhou but at the Yunnan end of the line, if the ordering in the infobox is correct which is the only place it seems to appear. It does not appear on the routemap at Changsha–Kunming high-speed railway, and I can’t find it with an equivalent check on zh.wp.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 09:55, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
pinging ASDFGH who created the template that refers to the station, which has included the article from the start, in case they know something about it.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 11:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - this is a useless one-line substub created by a blocked user, so it probably should be deleted. But FWIW, the station does exist and it's called 旧县站 in Chinese, see [1]. And it's in Yunnan, not Guizhou. (The creator couldn't even get a single sentence right). -Zanhe (talk) 23:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete I couldn't find enough resources that justify the subject's notability.JPL549 (talk) 10:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.