Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jitendra Kumar Social Activist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:13, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jitendra Kumar Social Activist[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Typical "well-sourced" puff piece filled with "journalism" provided by the subject or his company. Sources in the article include Global Kashmir.net (which have the honesty to label the text an advertisement), and the exact same text from e.g. Times of Malwa or Bollywoodmascot or Voice of Hindu. Other sources like APN News are equally unreliable. Fram (talk) 08:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. Fram (talk) 08:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir,

We have removed the all uncertained news sources. Please check and Update the article. Vrishti17 (talk) 10:19, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Considering sources like this and this, I see very little progress. Something like this, claiming "The Xpert Times and Times of UP are the world’s leading media associations for lifestyle news, government issues, business, entertainment and more." is a bit hard to take serious as a real journalistic source and not some thinly disguised PR text. Fram (talk) 10:43, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete COI/UPE here. No notability. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 00:32, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of notability Kazanstyle (talk) 08:56, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: for what it's worth, I've just blocked the creator of this article as a sock. The page could almost certainly be deleted under G5, but as there's an active AfD I'll leave it up. firefly ( t · c ) 12:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.