Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jirawat Hemansutikun

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:14, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jirawat Hemansutikun[edit]

Jirawat Hemansutikun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Evrdkmkm (talk) 01:03, 5 May 2019 (UTC) this person is notable, too short article, unsourced and unclear texts in this article. /the ref. that they're add like the ref. maybe it's fake links and not available.--Evrdkmkm (talk) 01:03, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 01:58, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 01:58, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You may like to try proposing a deletion instead of requesting speedy deletion next time. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:04, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Correction: I see, my information is unnecessary per the edits to Jiho Lee: I'm apparently not suggesting something new here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:12, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. An earlier version of this article at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jirawat_Hemansutikun&oldid=818693523 was longer and had more references. The nominator has a pattern of deleting text from and then seeking deletion of articles about Thai models. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 02:08, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • he is notable if he is famous in Thailand or Asia he will still have his article on Thai wiki and they will not removed from Thai wiki. so his fans knows him only on his social media like FB and IG not in entertainment or fashion industries.--Evrdkmkm (talk) 12:20, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Note: The above comment probably misunderstood the meaning of the word notable, and meant the opposite. I've removed extra bold text. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:19, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - only one of the 4 reference links were working and it was to Bugaboo, a streaming service, so references are sketchy, certainly not "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject" as required by WP:BASIC - and the only external link is to a Facebook page - his one award is not "well-known and significant" as required by WP:ANYBIO - does not meet notability requirements - Epinoia (talk) 16:01, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • The four references in the article are archived on the Wayback Machine. They are: an online reproduction of a photoshoot interview from Attitude magazine[1], a column from Post Today newspaper (the archival of which appears to be broken so no text was archived)[2], a catalogue listing showing cover of said Attitude issue[3], and a talk show in which he appeared as a guest[4]. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:05, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 06:42, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.