Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jinyu Qin Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:42, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jinyu Qin Society

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence of notability Legacypac (talk) 06:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 10:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 10:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 10:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep: have you even checked it on Google?--淺藍雪^❉ 16:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did indeed. 33 hits total including books, but when you take out duplicate hits where the content or website is the same, there are just a few separate and pretty low quality English sources that barely confirm the existence of this group. I don't read Chinese so I can't assess the notability in Chinese. Is there a related Chinese article on Wikipedia? Legacypac (talk) 21:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I beieve I have already provided the link to chinese article before this nomination--淺藍雪^❉ 09:42, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment When nominating an article for deletion, the nominator should explain the reason why it doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:SNG, especially when the article does cite sources. Otherwise the deletion rationale will be considered nothing but WP:JNN.--114.81.255.41 (talk) 05:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just FYI that zh:今虞琴社 was also created by 淺藍雪 above in July 2014, and has just slightly more details over the same content and sources. Still the sources looks promising to an editor uninitiated in traditional Chinese music like myself, with (1) (4) (5) discussing the Society's activity and impact more than mere passing mentions. The Society was also listed multiple times in a Taiwanese chronology of music events [1] and a Chinese music dictionary [2]. 野狼院ひさし _{Hisashi Yarouin} 15:27, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.