Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jinx.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. JERRY talk contribs 17:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jinx.com[edit]
This could potentially be controversial- Jinx.com seems a fairly famous website, but I am seeing no evidence that it is notable, and so I bring it here for discussion. I was responsible for cleaning the article a little a while back, and even removed a prod, but I basically did that because I had heard of the site, and so assumed it must be notable. J Milburn (talk) 14:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 18:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep: Another one of these cases where the website is very popular in the Internet community, but doesn't get a lot of mainstream coverage. I did find some coverage of Jinx [1], [2] -- pb30<talk> —Preceding comment was added at 13:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 18:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep appears to meet, WP:WEB based on the links provided by Pb30 and [3], if barely. --Asmodeus Samael (talk) 18:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Eah. The link cited by Samael provides just enough notability it my mind. Barely. seresin | wasn't he just...? 21:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep: Jinx.com is the sole distributor of merchandise for the wildly popular World of Warcraft computer games, runs notable forums in the computer security online community, is the publisher of a series of podcasts called "J!nxcasts", and has and organized community at defcon. Zelmerszoetrop (talk) 20:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.