Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Hegarty (Galway Hurler)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No argument for deletion has been advanced by either the nominator or subsequent comments. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 00:54, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Hegarty (Galway Hurler)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was at AfC and I do not know how to judge it, because i do not know the different leagues. I thought the fairest way to proceed was to bring it here. DGG ( talk ) 14:17, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close and revert back to AFC - This article is not ready for the mainspace, it was an AFC until the nominator approved it, then proded it as noted in the articles history. I previously declined it as it is not ready for the mainspace. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:56, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close and revert back to AFC Agreed, this should be sent back to AFC if a mistake has been made. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 11:37, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per NGAELIC 3. Cited article makes it clear that he passes that test. Kevin McE (talk) 21:50, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - there's no need for the disambiguator in the title, as there are no other articles on WP about anyone called Jimmy Hegarty -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:12, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why relist? There is no argument for deletion, and given that it meets notability standards, no grounds to delete. Kevin McE (talk) 08:38, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.