Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Ogonowski
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect. Stifle (talk) 11:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Jim Ogonowski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Failed candidate for political office -- not notable on that basis alone. No other basis for notability offered. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. See also WP:BLP1E. RayAYang (talk) 11:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 11:54, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 11:55, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect to Massachusetts's 5th congressional district special election, 2007. Notability is not inherited from candidacy. The campaign is notable, not the person. Fails WP:POLITICIAN Montco (talk) 20:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Needs re-write with NYTImes, Time and other notable WP:RSs. I would support with re-write.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 13:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It was only made for his candidacy for the House and Senate he doesnt serve in any office or hold a position anywhere else Gang14 (talk) 20:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.