Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Montgomery (radio host)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. soft deletion given low participation Spartaz Humbug! 16:34, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Jim Montgomery (radio host)[edit]
- Jim Montgomery (radio host) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. He's a WP:LOCAL radio personality in Memphis. He hosts a call-in show about computers; I suspect he's not even particularly well known in Memphis. I've added a reference, but I don't think he passes WP:ANYBIO. Pburka (talk) 21:52, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Cross-referencing the source provided in the article and WREC's programming schedule, his show occurs during a paid programming block, which means it's brokered programming paid for out of the subject's pocket and not subject to WREC's editorial control. No notability then, just like many of the other computer hosts who have to buy infomercial time to get their show on. Nate • (chatter) 10:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.