Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Jam and Sunny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  09:59, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Jam and Sunny

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Wikipedia general notability guideline and film guideline. Cannot find any awards given to show, or news article about it. Tdts5 (talk) 20:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:SOFIXIT case; airs on a national network, available on multiple video providers and disc formats (and it even had a magazine). Look deeper (and a lot of shows never get anything for their mantle; that's not one of our standards for an article). Nate • (chatter) 21:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete but if kept, rename to Jim Jam & Sunny. Firstly, this is not a film; it's a TV programme. The correct guideline is WP:TVSHOW, which JJ*&S meets: "Generally, an individual radio or television program is likely to be notable if it airs on ... a cable television network with a national audience." Secondly, the title needs to be changed: the ampersand is the official name and is critical when searching for sources. Thirdly, I can't find any RSs about it all, nor can I think of any offline sources that are likely to mention it. It's mentioned once in a novel, but that's not enough to suggest it's got the kind of momentum to mean it will be included in future specialist works on children's TV. Fails WP:NPOSSIBLE. Matt's talk 01:37, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:29, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:52, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep completely meet Wikipedia′s lowsMr.ref (talk) 14:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.