Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill McCormick (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jill McCormick[edit]
- Jill McCormick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (people) Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Entertainers and WP:BLP. Very hard to find sources about her except for the wedding and her model 'profile'. This article nominated for deletion in 2005 before there was a policy for sources. It passed on the fact that she was featured on magazines but it's unsourced still. I can't find a source on it except for mirrors. Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 04:12, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:20, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - For the reasons cited in the 2005 deletion discusion. Jrcrin001 (talk) 05:26, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- First, there's only ONE reason from the previous discussion and I just explained that they are NO sources for it (she appearing in magazines which fails the 'modern day'
Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Pornographic_actors_and_modelsWikipedia:Notability (people)#Entertainers). It also has never been proven that she appeared in any of those. Which I blatantly said in the nomination. If you find a source on that, then and only that does the the 2005 deletion discussion applies. --Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 09:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- First, there's only ONE reason from the previous discussion and I just explained that they are NO sources for it (she appearing in magazines which fails the 'modern day'
- Keep I see three sources in the article currently, and we have[1][2][3][4] Darkness Shines (talk) 19:56, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Marrying a Rock Star doesn't make the person notable. (see Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Family) I mean seriously? Should every singers partner get an article. Because all their wedding make the news with their partners names. And that's the only sources you found. Nothing about her. I mean you need sources about her notability and that's about her modeling career. That's the only reason she can have notability (and subsequently an article). Marrying a Rock Star doesn't make her notable nor do the sources about them. Find a source about her modeling career and not one that's tied to her marriage to Eddie Vedder. I repeat again. You won't find one. I've tried. You don't even address if she meets
Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Pornographic_actors_and_modelsWikipedia:Notability (people)#Entertainers.--Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 09:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Marrying a Rock Star doesn't make the person notable. (see Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Family) I mean seriously? Should every singers partner get an article. Because all their wedding make the news with their partners names. And that's the only sources you found. Nothing about her. I mean you need sources about her notability and that's about her modeling career. That's the only reason she can have notability (and subsequently an article). Marrying a Rock Star doesn't make her notable nor do the sources about them. Find a source about her modeling career and not one that's tied to her marriage to Eddie Vedder. I repeat again. You won't find one. I've tried. You don't even address if she meets
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 06:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The following links may be useful.
http://jillmccormick.iwarp.com/
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/gossip/2010/09/eddie-vedder-jill-mccormick-married.html
http://www.celebritybabyscoop.com/category/eddie-vedder
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_gender_and_name_of_Eddie_Vedder's_second_child_with_Jill_McCormick
Jrcrin001 (talk) 06:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment 2 - the following may be even better.
http://www.fashionmodeldirectory.com/models/jill_mccormick
http://www.spokeo.com/Jill+Mccormick+1
http://www.pxdrive.com/album/JILL+MCCORMICK_pictures_gsiapic/
http://www.ask.com/questions-about/Jill-McCormick-Model
http://www.in.com/jill-mccormick/profile-1949053.html
http://www.fanpix.net/gallery/jill-mccormick-pictures.htm
http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2010/09/jill-mccormick-lily-aldridge-stephanie-seymour-balthazar-getty---couple-news.html
http://www.fashionmodeldirectory.com/models/jill_mccormick/showphoto/86289/
http://www.pixmule.com/jill-mccormick/3/
Jrcrin001 (talk) 07:11, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.