Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jigo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. recreatioon of the original and a rewritten article encouraged Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jigo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable character from movie, not notable enough for separate article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- —Farix (t | c) 16:18, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the film Princess Mononoke. —Farix (t | c) 16:18, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete from article history (if possible) and restore original article nothing worth merging as it is purely the creators personal opinion and an inappropriate fan site link, but a usable search term. Creator apparently upsurped another article, but said article was an unnotable dictionary definition[1], but as it already has a purpose and presumably links, the original should probably be restored and the creators attempts to take it over removed. -- AnmaFinotera (talk ~ contribs) 16:29, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate with hatnote. Delete, restore the article before usurpation and add a hatnote. —I-20 the highway 17:29, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article here before this one was this, which isn't worth restoring unless someone does some serious work on it. Googling gives mostly irrelevant hits about other stuff with the same name ([2]), so a redirect looks pointless as the film character isn't the primary usage. There is no material worth saving here. Alzarian16 (talk) 17:18, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.