Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jibboom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Black Kite (talk) 20:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Jibboom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. (PROD contested by the author, without any explanation.) JamesBWatson (talk) 14:43, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
MergeRedirect to Bowsprit, not enough coverage in reliable sources for an independent article. Yunshui 雲水 14:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment well....... this link looks pretty good: [1] for one thing. My advice would be to check the concept out in Google Books and see what you can find.--Coin945 (talk) 15:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- GoogleBooks was actually the first place I looked... I agree that there's a ton of mentions there, but none of them actually say anything much about the jibboom. Your link, above, is one of the better ones, but it does little more than simply define the term (and, per JamesBWatson's nomination, this isn't a dictionary). Yunshui 雲水 15:29, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment well....... this link looks pretty good: [1] for one thing. My advice would be to check the concept out in Google Books and see what you can find.--Coin945 (talk) 15:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - interesting to note that jib boom is a redirect to jib.HausTalk 02:22, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- The jibboom is a notable part of a ship. Wikipedia has articles for hawsehole, mainsail, hull, bowsprit, gunwale, etc., so why not jibboom? Maybe you can't write 10,000 words about jibbooms, but we have much less to say on pelican strikers and yet everyone agrees that the article pelican striker belongs here. Quinoaeater (talk) 05:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep part of what should be basic encyclopedic coverage of a notable subject. The various parts of a ship are notable, just as the different parts of an automobile are. DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.