Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiaqing Emperor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Emperors are inherently notable, possibly a disruptive nom at work here. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jiaqing Emperor[edit]

Fails WP:Notability. Relatively unknown powerless Chinese person. ItoFMA (talk) 01:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep, under ¶2 of WP:SK#Applicability, which supports speedily keeping an article whose nomination for deletion is "unquestionably vandalism or disruption and nobody unrelated recommends deleting it . . . . Examples of this include (i) obviously frivolous nominations." An emperor is China is per se notable, and I suspect the nomination was made (inappropriately) as some sort of commentary on notability arguments. Pop Secret (talk) 01:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.