Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jezweb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:45, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jezweb[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP, a single minor award and no evidence of reliable source significant coverage. — MarkH₂₁^talk 06:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — MarkH₂₁^talk 06:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — MarkH₂₁^talk 06:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — MarkH₂₁^talk 06:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 07:39, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks like a successful small local business, one of gizillions working in webdev. I could find nothing that indicates encyclopedic notability. Aoziwe (talk) 09:40, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Self serving article of little value. Page creator already has several warnings on their user page. Teraplane (talk) 22:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In case someone doesn't notice, the Maitland Mercury article is an advertising feature (so not independent RS). — MarkH₂₁^talk 07:03, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article main text describes a company going about its mundane business, with no claim to notability, nor does a Hunter Region local business award change that. No evidence of notability found. AllyD (talk) 12:19, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.