Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish World Review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Apparent bad-faith nomination with a boilerplate rationale proven incorrect by the sourcing in the article. Drmies (talk) 00:41, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish World Review[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable based on sourcing. Herp Derp (talk) 22:56, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to? Not that I'm invested in retaining this article, but it seems like a ridiculous objection on your part. The website carries dozens of nationally syndicated columnists. I don't know exactly what sort of references you're looking for.

Ruthfulbarbarity (talk) 23:18, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, even if the sole criterion by which to judge notability is how many times other newspapers, magazines or other online sources reference the subject-which it shouldn't be, since the whole point of JWR is to be an opinion journal-it meets that litmus test. As the links-which, unfortunately, are dead-to Human Events and Wall Street Journal op-eds demonstrate. There's also an article in the Jewish Week about the Jewish World Review. I'm sure there are others online, but I don't have the time or patience to search for them. As I wrote earlier, it's a ridiculous objection.

Ruthfulbarbarity (talk) 23:26, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.