Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish Defense League Chapters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:37, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Defense League Chapters[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the sort of list we ordinarily do not include, according to NOT DIRECTORY Any significant material should go in the main page for the organization. DGG ( talk ) 04:28, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete In general it's better to direct people to an organization's own website for this kind of information since it is constantly changing. Besides that the JDL has been called a terrorist organization so it's probably better for WP not to get involved giving out their addresses. Northwestgnome (talk) 04:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom, but not per Northwestgnome due to WP:NOTCENSORED. Their being labeled a terrorist organisation is not relevant to what information we cover on them. Handschuh-^{talk to me} 05:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete First, the JDL is not a terrorist group, nor has it ever been an official one. You can read that in the Jewish Defense League article. More importantly, this article can be deleted, but only when all the information is replaced in the main Jewish Defense League article. All of the info should be retained when transfered back to the main article. The Jewish Defense League Chapters article was created by User:Big Mac, and he removed it from the main Jewish Defense League article. See here.--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 05:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete Agree with User:Big Mac. I am erasing my previous argument.--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 18:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete I spun this article off from the main JDL article because it makes the main article too long, and the list contains too many unfinished or non-substantial sections. However, I think there is enough valuable material to maintain it as a separate article and improve upon it. I disagree about its deletion content-wise but will accept it if the article do not meet Wikipedia standards. JDL is not a terrorist organization and takes a firm no-tolerance policy toward felonious activities, but as was stated previously that is outside the scope of this discussion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Big Mac (talk • contribs) 08:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Big Mac. --Webley455 (talk) 05:46, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.