Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jevon O'Neill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kept as nominator changed their vote to Keep. (non-admin closure) Dial911 (talk) 03:04, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jevon O'Neill

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. The only secondary coverage I find is about his films and mentions him incidentally. Rogermx (talk) 16:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Satisfies WP:CREATIVE with multiple periodical reviews of his films. Seems to have won the Sutherland Trophy and been nominated for the Emden Film Award. James500 (talk) 17:05, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- One obscure film does not translate into a significant body of creative work. Also, the number of film reviews really does not matter.Rogermx (talk) 20:03, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:02, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:41, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The article is now fleshed out and includes additional citations. The subject has received two film awards and was profiled in a British newspaper article. His first two films - not "obscure" - have been reviewed by Variety, The Guardian and Time Out London. His third film, Mr Benn, is, according to news accounts, in production and being bankrolled by a large production company based in London. Subject passes WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE and meets notability guidelines. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 21:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY as the article has been significantly improved with the addition of reliable sources, passes WP:CREATIVE, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:53, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with Atlantic306. Dial911 (talk) 02:20, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As nominator, I now agree with Keep instead of delete thanks to improvements to article from other editors.Rogermx (talk) 02:54, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.