Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JetGreen Airways

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:15, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

JetGreen Airways

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is just riddiculous. This "airline" was around for only one week. I doubt that this was an airline at all, rather a tour operator which leased one single aircraft from Icelandair. Anyway, there is no significant coverage of this company itself, so the article should be deleted per WP:CORP. --FoxyOrange (talk) 20:13, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Wow, FoxyOrange really does not like airlines today. Here you go:
- JetGreen passengers stranded in Spain
- JetGreen Airways ceases trading after just one week
- JetGreen.gone - budget fliers stranded as airline goes bust
- JetGreen hopes to find a place in the Spanish sun
- Changing Flights (semi-tangential mention, but puts it in the context of other low-cost airlines that did the closed)
  Did you bother to do a Google search before nominating? Because that's how I found those, and were it not for having a real life where there is actual shit I need to get done, I'd have easily found more. And if you did not, can we safely assume that you've also not done that for the other airlines in your little AFD Jihad? Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 20:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources found by Collard. Notability is not temporary. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Based on the above reliable, secondary sources found by Collard (talk · contribs) for whom I thank, this subject certainly passes WP:GNG and WP:CORP requirements. I'd cite the nominator to read the deletion policy, notability policy and things to do before nominating at articles for deletion before creating further debates. TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 01:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.