Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesuton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 13:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jesuton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable artist. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 00:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As far as I see, no brittish artist walking by the streets of Rio would be able to meet WP:GNG with YouTube videos. Also, even with it, it would still probably fail WP:MUSIC, as he has not released an album, or released a single.... or nothing, really. He seems to have got a record contract, but until he releases an album and becomes widely known, he can't have an article. Heck, I have released 7 singles and 3 extended plays and I still don't meet GNG :( — ΛΧΣ²¹ 00:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment On the fence here - I did find a couple more reliable sources:

http://www.timeout.com.br/rio-de-janeiro/en/music/features/231/jesuton-interview

http://www.correio24horas.com.br/noticias/detalhes/detalhes-1/artigo/das-ruas-do-rio-para-a-som-livre-inglesa-jesuton-encanta-pela-voz/

Not sure it is enough to constitute significant coverage at this point. Nwlaw63 (talk) 13:13, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Still NN to my mind. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.