Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Rodriguez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. – Avi 04:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Rodriguez[edit]

Non-notable as the daughter of a "high-ranking Scientology official" and "Katie Holmes' Scientology minder." Ckessler 21:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In spite of the article's claims, I fail to see the relevance or notability of this person, except perhaps to other scientologists. -Amatulic 21:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep multiple pieces of non-trivial coverage PT ^(s-s-s-s) 22:11, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, just barely enough sources of non-trivial coverage. In general, there should be more sunshine on people who are running the Scientology organization. For such a controversial org, they don't get much coverage individually. hateless 22:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I absolutely agree that the people running this organization should be made public, however, I don't think that Rodriguez fits that description. By the information here, she seems to be a mid-level member at best, only known for being the child of a higher-up and her loose affiliation with a celeb member. Ckessler 23:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- But she has media coverage, that's all we need. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 23:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Media coverage - even by high profile news sources - in itself does not automatically equal encyclopedic notability. For instance, see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/George_Allen_Smith and the subsequent deletion review. Wikipedia is not a news database Bwithh 03:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Celebrity entourage members are not inherently notable. I think a mention in the Katie Holmes articles is fine though. Bwithh 03:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable individual. Smeelgova 04:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per nom. Also, how can anyone ruining the Scientology cult be bad? TJ Spyke 05:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Jessica is the brain of Katie Holmes. --Tilman 06:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable persion, fails WP:BIO. Edgecution 06:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Bwithh hit the nail on the head. WP:BIO is not fufilled; WP:RS does not over-ride WP:BIO. Daniel .Bryant 12:13, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable. Alpharigel 19:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. --PhilipO 19:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Eusebeus 09:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.