Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Morse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:31, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Morse

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a person notable only as an as yet non-winning candidate in a future election. As always, this is not grounds for a Wikipedia article in and of itself -- if you cannot demonstrate and properly source that she was already notable enough for a Wikipedia article for some other reason besides being a candidate, then she has to win the election, not just run in it, to become notable as a politician. But this does not make any claim of preexisting notability at all -- all of the content outside of her campaign-related coverage itself is referenced to primary sources, not to any evidence that she was getting media coverage for any of it at the time. And the campaign-related coverage itself does not make a candidate notable just for being a candidate, either — it just makes her a WP:BLP1E, and because every candidate in every election always gets some campaign-related coverage, the existence of that coverage does not automatically get a candidate over WP:GNG all by itself. As always, no prejudice against recreation in November if she wins the seat -- but nothing stated or sourced here entitles her to already have a Wikipedia article today.
Also, this is a conflict of interest, as the page creator openly declares themself as a volunteer for the subject's campaign on their own userpage. As always, even if a person does clear our notability standards they or their staff still don't get to create the article themselves. Bearcat (talk) 20:55, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 20:59, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not a place for candidates to place their campaign brouchures.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - running for a position is not sufficient to support WP:NPOL criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 18:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as WP:TOOSOON (if she wins), and WP:NOTPROMOTION. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:08, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.