Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Jarrell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 07:46, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Jarrell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Maybe in a few years. ^Bongo_matic 03:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. B.Rossow ^talk_contr 18:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - signed to a major record label and asked to perform for POTUS. Just squeaks in as notable, IMO. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BAND - non notable musician. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Performing at the White House Easter Egg Roll is hardly "performing for POTUS"—the source is not NPOV in the first place, and the summary in the article doesn't even reflect what's in the source. Being signed to a major label isn't what establishes WP:BAND—it's releasing two albums on one. ^Bongo_matic 01:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken, with thanks. Vote changed above. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.