Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Fortin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 09:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Fortin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Assistant professor with unexceptional citation counts fails WP:NPROF. A412 (Talk • C) 07:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. A412 (Talk • C) 07:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not remotely near a pass of WP:Prof. Created by an spa. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Delete agreed, probably nothing wrong with her as an early-career scientist, but way too soon for an article, doesn't meet NPROF. Elemimele (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, Canada, Indiana, and Michigan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 12:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Awards are early career, https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=YGcW8CEAAAAJ isn't especially notable, seems like WP:TOOSOON at best. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promising early career with some awards, but too soon. -- Jaireeodell (talk) 15:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.