Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Featherby

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:40, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Featherby[edit]

Jessica Featherby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. Film/tv roles have not been significant. Stage roles are not major productions. Boneymau (talk) 22:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 23:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 23:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Does not meet WP:GNG. -- WV 03:25, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete does not pass our notability guidelines for actresses.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:32, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, the biggest claim to fame here is a bit part in Summer Heights High, but there isn't much in the way of in-depth coverage of that role or character in reliable independent sources. The other parts are either very minor parts in notable productions or notable parts in very minor productions, again with little in the way of coverage. The interview in "Femail" is substantial but the rest of the coverage here is of the "mere mention" variety. Absolutely not a reflection of her work ethic or talent, but she doesn't quite meet our notability criteria just yet. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete - even an ongoing part on TV does not confer automatic notability. Bearian (talk) 03:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - does not meet WP:NACTOR criteria. Rogermx (talk) 20:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - She does not seem to meet the notability criteria for WP:NACTOR. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:08, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.