Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Ellis
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 06:06, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Jessica Ellis[edit]
- Jessica Ellis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only one notable character, does not meet WP:GNG. Created by blocked editor. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable enough for own article. Only one notable role with next to no filmography otherwise. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 02:50, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete My thoughts exactly, @Beemer69:. Not notable enough to have an article as shown by the stubby depth of the article itself. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 03:32, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG. Not to be confused with Professor Ellis who is probably notable. L3X1 (distænt write) 16:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete guidelines require multiple notable roles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:36, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to List_of_Hollyoaks_characters_(2013)#Tegan_Lomax seems sensible until she does some more. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:48, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.