Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Capelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus leaning towards a weak keep, due to recognition within her field and the industry, and coverage in some secondary sourcing. -- Cirt (talk) 15:21, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Capelli[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet any of the four WP:PORNBIO criteria. NW (Talk) 22:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 05:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You´re a funny guy, can you see the international wikis? Keep is the only possible result. She is really famous in the business. --Hixteilchen (talk) 14:22, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO and the GNG, no nontrivial GNews hits. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Viewed 11,000+ times in December 2010[1], 11 interwiki links, 2 AVN nominations, 5+ year old article, + existence of at least some sourcing that can be easily found suggests we should keep this one.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 04:05, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.