Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess Green

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jess Green[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Green was mayor of American Fork, Utah. At less than 30,000 people this is not a truly significant city at the level to make the mayor default notable. The sources are not either significant enough or enough focused on Green to demonstrate he passes the general notability guidelines. John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 November 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:04, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 16:17, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 16:17, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Mayors do not get an automatic presumption of notability under WP:NPOL just for existing — a mayor's notability is conditional on passing WP:GNG, and if that's not already present then a mayor gets the benefit of the doubt only if the place is considerably larger than American Fork. But the volume of sourcing shown here is not enough to pass GNG. Bearcat (talk) 14:45, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 08:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Bearcat and established consensus that there is not a presumption of notability for a mayor of a city under a certain population threshold, usually 50,000 if the mayor was independently elected, rather than selected by the council. - --Enos733 (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.