Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jersey Champs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arguments for deletion appear to be well founded in WP:PAG. No credible argument for retention has been made. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jersey Champs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG, at a very minimum multiple sources are required to establish notability, not just one article in the local newspaper. Bringing to AfD since this was deprodded without explaination. Rusf10 (talk) 17:49, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:52, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:53, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I was able to find 1 more source: One on Yahoo (How Sean Kelly, Owner of Jersey Champs, Raised Over $250,000.00 For XXXTentacion's Charity), not sure if notable enough though, this is a very borderline case before I say anything regarding a keep or delete. It does seem promotional in it's nature. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:42, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:47, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can not speak on other editors of wiki however for every article I have written I have not been paid to do so which is fact! What you are thinking is completly wrong. If the articles in which I have written do not fit wiki policy and need improvement and or better sourcing thats whole another thing in itself.Your Favorite Writers Writer (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.