Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry L. Mills
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:19, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jerry L. Mills (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined CSD WP:G11. I am not finding any WP:GNG sources about this person. There are sources that quote this person, but that doesn't establish notability. Aside from GNG (and WP:NBIO), I don't see evidence that their publications meet WP:NAUTHOR notability. Levivich 14:49, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Levivich 14:49, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Levivich 14:49, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Levivich 14:49, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coolperson177 (talk) 21:05, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coolperson177 (talk) 21:05, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete a few passing quotes, burried in the 8th paragraph or so in articles, do not show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:09, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:12, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:12, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete – there doesn't seem to be anything that would contribute toward GNG notability: being quoted in the press doesn't provide significant coverage, nor does a single-sentence trivial mention. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:44, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.