Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerrol LeBaron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 15:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jerrol LeBaron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a biography of an individual, but coverage of an upcoming documentary of unknown notability. Please consider whether this page should be moved to Honor in Office (documentary) or Honor in Office Act, or deleted until either of those become notable. As a side issue, the author has a conflict of interest, being a representative of Commlines Media, who are paid by Mr LeBaron to promote his business inktip.com (see [1]). TrulyBlue (talk) 08:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed guidelines and understand the discussion/argument on whether the entry should be closed and moved to Honor In Office. After looking specifically at notable, I concur that the Jerrol LeBaron entry should be moved to Honor in Office (documentary) and, at a later time, should it be appropriate, a new entry for Jerrol LeBaron created. Commlines —Preceding undated comment added 15:48, 25 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move As the article really isn't about Jerrol LeBaron it should be moved to Honor in Office (documentary) and Honor in Office Act if enough resource can be gathered to show notability.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, WP:FILMMAKER, WP:PEOPLE. Also, if this material were to be merged or moved to a hypothetical "Honor in Office" article, it would require serious work in order to satisfy WP:NPOV; the existing article is unacceptably strongly biased in favour of the proposal. Richwales (talk · contribs) 18:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BIO. Beagel (talk) 20:08, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.