Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeri-KO (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salt. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeri-KO

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination. Was previously deleted at AfD on WP:TOOSOON grounds, but after a search, I'm seeing sources dated after that AfD, so I think the circumstances have changed since then and this is not G4 eligible. May or may not now be notable. Adam9007 (talk) 15:38, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Do we have any wrestlers appropriately named so that WWE can create the team of "Jeri-Tol"? Seriously, the deletion arguments of the previous AFD still apply. This is further evidence of cherry-picking news sites to the point where Wikipedia resembles another news site and not anything one could remotely call an "encyclopedia", ignoring that their goals aren't exactly compatible with our intended goals. Indifferently creating articles on every new middling tag team to appear on television while we lack articles on countless other tag teams with real accomplishments, or only covering those teams by filling up content with match results (which has been a basis for deletion in other wrestling-related AFDs) will only harm the encyclopedia in the long term. I didn't even point out that the article was recreated by a new user who did little but slap together an infobox with a blatant copyvio photo and that subsequent edits amount to going through the motions, mainly because AFD isn't cleanup. Still, looking at the past history, I fail to see where you can go from that without engaging in blatant puffery. All that may change if they accomplish more than appearing on television together and/or having a page on certain websites. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 23:00, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete and Salt Piling on more recent WP:ROUTINE match results doesn't make this any more notable than it was last time.LM2000 (talk) 01:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt - this is no better than it was. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt Per all of the above. Nickag989^talk 18:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt Per nom, currently fails WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.188.136.234 (talk) 01:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt Per Nom. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 22:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt per above seanhaley1 (talk) 00:00, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Suspicious account: Please note that the above contributor has recently created an account, rapidly made 10 edits and then started !voting on multiple AfDs, many of which don't make sense. See Special:Contributions/Seanhaley1 for their edits. There is a possibility that this is an undisclosed paid editor/canvassed editor/sockpuppet who is probably voting on multiple AfDs to hide the actual target. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:55, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.