Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Reading

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 September 28.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and redirect to Beauty and the Geek Australia. Consensus to delete; seems fair enough as a redirect. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:35, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Reading[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated due to lack of notability. This person's achievements are not important enough to warrant a separate page; the page is thus orphaned. Many sources are almost impossibly to verify, especially content on high school and other academic achievements and balloon modelling. Mike3685 (talk) 09:22, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:PROMOTION. DonCalo (talk) 16:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:BLP1E. LibStar (talk) 12:19, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.