Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Jahns (YouTuber)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:18, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Jahns (YouTuber)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-procedural nomination. An article about this person was deleted twice before (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Jahns and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Jahns (2nd nomination), but I just declined a G4 because the deleted versions of the page were considerably different—notably, virtually all claims were sourced to the subject's YouTube channel itself. This version also includes assertions of notability (impressive-sounding subscriber and view numbers) that were not present in the deleted versions. Having said that, I still have grave doubts that notability is made out, and so I didn't want to just decline the speedy and leave it at that. If the article is kept, it should probably be moved to Jeremy Jahns. Steve Smith (talk) 22:29, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CREATIVE. Not every YouTube person with over 1,000,000 subscribers needs a page. KidAd (talk) 23:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kept: the article does have notable sources from CNBC and CBR thus giving him notability from respected outlets. He’s also had a show on go90, which was a streaming service that also had shows from people such as Ben Affleck, Matt Damon, LeBron James, and among others. In addition, he’s also an approved critic on Rotten Tomatoes. The page should be kept given he has done work outside of YouTube.Vinny Weasel (talk) 23:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most of the sources seem to not be reliable and how many subscribers on YouTube he has isn't really relevant to notability. Also, neither is him being a critic on Rotten Tomatoes or having a show on defunct streaming service that shows by celebrities. Since notability isn't by association. There is the CBR article which is mentioned above, but it only briefly mentions him to say he doesn't like the Star Wars movie. So, it's not in-depth enough to qualify for notability. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Procedural deletion that falls under criteria for deletion applied many times before. Nothing different here. ComicsAreJustAllRight (talk) 02:22, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OUTCOMES. We have deleted articles about YouTubers with over 2 million subscribers. That many viewers is now just run of the mill. Bearian (talk) 02:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.