Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Griffith (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. In view of the limited participation, this is a "soft deletion", equivalent to deletion by PROD: the article will be automatically restored on request to me or at WP:REFUND, but may then be re-nominated. JohnCD (talk) 18:47, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Griffith[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His books are published by "Foundation for Humanity's Adulthood", an organisation he established to promote his theory. Neither the organisation nor his theories are notable; they dont appear to have had any lasting influence on anyone other than Tim Macartney-Snape, and that article covers the ABC controversy already. A small note may also be warranted on Tasmanian Tiger. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 14:13, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 16:19, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — Baseball Watcher 22:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, apparently subject of one television report, but I can't find a transcript or details online (a brief mention here) though. However, as far as I can tell, Mr Griffith has not received coverage from any other source, thus falling afoul of the requirement for multiple sources at WP:BIO. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:40, 9 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.