Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Glick (author)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge/Redirect to Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (non-admin closure). --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 10:06, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Glick (author)

WP:BLP1E. Only notable for the O'Reilly interview, and nothing else since. Sceptre ^(talk) 13:53, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

keep for several reasons. One- its not listed in the sources, but iirc, he (and his confrontation with Bill O) is discussed in length in one of Al Franken's books ("Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them" I think). Second, even if he doesn't warrant his own page, there's still a disussion on the page for merging into its own section at the Criticism of Bill O'Reilly page. I think that it would be better to let that discussion play out before even considering this article for deletion. Umbralcorax (talk) 17:37, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A fine example of a BLP1E deletion candidate. Kyaa the Catlord (talk) 18:54, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect to Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (commentator)#Jeremy Glick. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:40, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect as per Brewcaster —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.255.12.148 (talk) 16:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Kyaa. Bytebear (talk) 02:59, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge / Redirect per Brewcaster. It is the exchange between Glick and O'Reilly that is noteworthy, rather than himself. FWIW I think the fall-out of the gibber from O'Reilly, Cowter and the rest ought, IMHO (a Brit who lived in the USA 2002-5), to be viewed in perhaps a slightly less "USA-centric" manner when considering notability and inclusion. Taking it globally, whether its media, politics and current affairs, culture; they - and especially their professional outrage quota productions - aren't such a big deal. Anyway. Plutonium27 (talk) 09:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.