Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jens David Breivik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. Whilst this doesn't meet the criteria for G10, there are serious BLP issues here, and no evidence of notability of the person himself. An optimist on the run! 22:22, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jens David Breivik[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

clear cut case of WP:NOTINHERITED. not to mention BLP concerns, I don't think he'd be comfortable because a WP article created because of his son's infamy. LibStar (talk) 12:44, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Being the relative of a fascist mass murderer is not sufficient grounds for encyclopedic biography. Clear failure of NOTINHERITED, particularly grievous due to its nature as a BLP. Merge any applicable information into the biography of the Great White Marxist Hunter. Carrite (talk) 16:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete This has very serious WP:BLP issues, and should have been WP:Speedy deletedNewmanoconnor (talk) 20:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as G10 - attack page. Violates WP:BLP, WP:CRIME, and WP:NOTINHERITED. - Jorgath (talk) ^(contribs) 21:14, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but not speedy--An ataack page is "entirely negative in tone and unsourced." To mention someone "coming under intense scrutiny" is not entirely negative in tone, and there were sources. But delete anyway. ChromaNebula (talk) 21:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per NOTINHERITED, but I've declined the G10 speedy delete request, as the article appeared to be factual and sourced and didn't contain any attack or negative unsourced BLP material that I could see. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.