Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Lim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jenny Lim[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks notability: possible WP:COI, the 2 main contributors have the same initials in their usernames as the political party referred to: Only links provided are to Facebook which has little of use. Constant removal of maintenance tags. Eagleash (talk) 04:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:GNG unless perhaps some foreign language independent sources can be found. I've found nothing in English. --Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 04:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as none of this is actually satisfying any applicable notability and I actually watchlisted this after encountering and patrolling it at NPP. SwisterTwister talk 04:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – None of her mentioned positions grant her notability per se—they all amount to being a local party functionary—and any other coverage appears to be lacking. —Nizolan ^(talk) 04:25, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —Nizolan ^(talk) 04:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. —Nizolan ^(talk) 04:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Clearly no significant coverage in reliable independent sources. - Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 07:10, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet GNG or WP:POLITICIAN. Puff piec created and maintained by apparent COI editors. David in DC (talk) 14:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree it does not meet WP:GNG or WP:POLITICIAN.--AhmedFaizP (talk) 19:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Basically just a résumé of a party functionary who has held no position that would confer an WP:NPOL pass — and with just one reference cited, not even close to enough reliable source coverage has been shown to get her over WP:GNG instead. Bearcat (talk) 18:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.